Association between Theory of Mind and Peer Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v2i2.51Keywords:
Theory of Mind, Peer Problems, False Belief, Development, ChildrenAbstract
The current study was designed to investigate the relationship between theory of mind (ToM) development and peer problems in Pakistani children (N=80). The non-probability purposive sampling technique with survey research design had been used for data collection. Pakistani children with age ranged 4-6 years (Mage = 5.29) were recruited who?took two false belief tasks.?To tap into peer relationship of these children, their parents completed?strength and difficulty?questionnaire. For demographic variables, descriptive statistics was used. Pearson product correlation and linear regression were used to test the hypothesis. Results revealed that performance of 6 years 6 months and older was above chance on all false belief tasks, supporting the universality of ToM development with different age ranges in different cultures. Also, theory of mind negatively predicted peer relationship?problems?of this sample, revealing real life implication of mentalizing for interaction in social world. Research indicated that false belief comprehension is key to better social adjustment and the participants of this study also showed that a child's understanding of mental state terms is critical for better social adaptation.
References
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, F. C. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Alival-Naveh, E., Rothschild-Yakar, L., & Kurman, J. (2019). Keeping culture in mind: A systematic review and initial conceptualization of mentalizing from a cross-cultural perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 26(4), e12300. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12300
Anjum, N., & Malik, F. (2010). Parenting practices in mothers of children with ADHD: Role of stress and behavioral problems in children. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8(1), 18-38. http://www.gcu.edu.pk/Soc&ClinPsyJour.htm
Astington, J. W., Margaret, J., & Edward, M. A. (2010). The development of theory of mind in early childhood. Encyclopedia on early childhood development. 1-4. http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/socialcognition/accordingexperts/development-theory-mind-early-childhood
Baidee, S. (2013). World development indicators (p. 29). Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Brooks, S. P., Gelman, A., Jones, G. L., & Meng, X.-L. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b10905
Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16, 378-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01544.x
Campbell, S. B., & von Stauffenberg, C. (2008). Child characteristics and family processes that predict behavioral readiness for school. In A Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.) Early disparities in school readiness: How do families contribute to successful and unsuccessful transitions to school. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Caputi, M., Lecce, S., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R. (2012). Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations: The role of prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48 (1), 257-270. DOI: 10.1037/a0025402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025402
Begeer, S., Gevers, C., Clifford, P., Verhoeve, M., Kat, K., Hoddenbach, E., & Boer, F. (2011). Theory of Mind training in children with autism: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 41(8), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1121-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1121-9
Chen, X., Huang, X., Wang, L., & Chang, L. (2012). Aggression, peer relationships, and depression in Chinese children: a multi wave longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53, 1233–1241.DOI:10.1111/j.14697610.2012.02576.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02576.x
De Gracia, M. R., de Rosnay, M., & Peterson, C. C. (2016). A cultural conundrum: Delayed false belief understanding in Filipino children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 929-940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116655790
De Villiers, J. G. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In J. W. Astington & J. Baird (Eds.), Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 186- 219). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0010
De Villiers, J. G., & De Villiers, A. P. (2014). The role of language in development oftheory of mind. Top Language Disorders. 34, 4. 313-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000037
de Villiers, J. G., Hollebrandse, B., & Hobbs, K. (2014). Recursive complements and propositional attitudes. In T. Roeper, & P. Speas (Eds.), Recursion. Berlin:Springer Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05086-7_10
De Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037–1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00073-4
Devine, R. T., White, N., Ensor, R., & Hughes, C. H. (2016). Theory of mind in middle childhood: Longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 52 758-771. DOI:10.1037/dev0000105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000105
Ensor, R., & Hughes, C. (2008). Content or connectedness? Mother child talk and early social understanding. Child Development, 79, 201–216. DOI:10.1111/j.14678624.2007.01120.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01120.x
Hughes, C. (2011). Social understanding and social lives: From toddlerhood through to the transition to school. New York: Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813225
Hughes, C., Adlam, A., Happe, F., Jackson, J., Taylor, A.,& Caspi, A. (2000). Good test retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 41, 483-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00633
Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., & Bonazinga, L. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the theory of mind inventory (ToMI): A study of typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 42, 327–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1244-7
Essau, C. A., Qadir, F., & Maqsood, A. (2017). Factor structure of the Urdu version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Pakistani adolescents. Act of Psychopathy, 3-1. DOI: 10.4172/2469-6676.100076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-6676.100076
Kuntoro, I. A., Peterson, C. C. & Slaughter, V. (2017). Culture, parenting and children’s theory of mind development in Indonesia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,48(9), 1389 –1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117725404
Lee, K., Olson, D. R., & Torrance, N. (1999). Chinese children’s under-standing of false beliefs: The role of language. Journal of Child Language, 26, 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000998003626
Liu, D., Wellman, H. M., Tardif, T., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2008). Theory of mind development in Chinese children: a meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental psychology, 44(2), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.523
Malle, B. (2018). Theory of mind. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. DOI:nobaproject.com
Mayer, A., & Trauble, B. (2012). Synchrony in the onset of mental state understanding across cultures? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025412454030
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W. & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta?analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x
Mizokawa, A., & Koyasu, M. (2013). Young children's moral judgments about pretend crying: Associations with mental-state understanding. Psychologia: an international journal of psychology in the Orient 56(4):223-236. DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2013.223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2013.223
Nawaz, S., Hanif, R., & Lewis, C. (2014). Theory of mind’ development of Pakistani children: Do preschoolers acquire an understanding of desire, pretence and belief in a universal sequence? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2):177-188. DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2014.973843
Nawaz, S., Hanif, R., & Lewis, C. (2015). ‘Theory of mind’ development of Pakistani children: Do preschoolers acquire an understanding of desire, pretense and belief in a universal sequence? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2),177-188. DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2014.973843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.973843
Nawaz, S., & Lewis, C. (2017). Mother–child conversation and social understanding in Pakistan. International Journal of behavioral development. 1-10.DOI:10.1177/0165025417741365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417741365
Nelson, K. (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In: Astington J. W, Baird J, editors. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Oxford University Press; New York: 26–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0002
Oh, S., & Lewis, C. (2008). Korean preschoolers’ advanced inhibitory control and its relation to other executive skills and mental state understanding. Child Development, 79(1), 80-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01112.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01112.x
Patnaik, B. (2008). Children's theory of mind: educational, school and instructional implications. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34(2), 329- 336.
Pears, K. C., & Moses, L. J. (2003). Demographics, parenting, and theory of mind in preschool children. Social Development, 12, 1-20. DOI:10.1111/1467-9507.00219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00219
Peterson, C., Slaughter, V., Moore, C., & Wellman, H. M. (2016). Peer social skills and theory of mind in children with autism, deafness, or typical development. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 46-57. DOI:10.1037/a0039833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039833
Rajendran, G., & Mitchell, P. (2007) Cognitive theories of autism. Developmental Review, 27, 224–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.02.001
Schlotz, W., Jones, A., Phillips, D. I. W., Gale, C. R., Robinson, S. M., & Godfrey, K.M. (2010). Lower maternal folate status in early pregnancy is associated with childhood hyperactivity and peer problems in offspring. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 51(5), 594- 602. DOI:10.1111/j.14697610.2009.02182.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02182.x
Shahaeian, A. (2015). Sibling, family and social influences on children’s theory of mind understanding. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46 (6), 805-820. DOI:10.1177%2F0022022115583897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115583897
Slaughter, V., Imuta, K., Peterson, C. C., & Henry, J. D. (2015). Meta-analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child Development, 86(4), 1159-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12372
Wellman, H. M. (2007). Understanding the psychological world: Developing a theory of mind Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 167-187): Blackwell Publishers Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996652.ch8
Wellman, H. M. (2012). Making minds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199334919.001.0001
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development,75, 523–DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction
and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the Journal website at (https://iprpk.com/ojs/index.php/jpap)