Association of Cognitive Learning Style with Attitude towards Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v3i2.109Keywords:
Attitude towards Science, Cognitive Learning Styles, Field Dependent, Field IndependentAbstract
Scientific literacy has become an indispensable modern skill set. For a long time, cognitive psychologists and educators have been focused on the understanding of individual differences and its influence on teaching and motivation to learn science. This research was executed to find the association of Field Dependent- Field Independent cognitive learning styles and attitude towards science. Quantitative approach was used in this research and survey research method was used in it. A sample of 478 undergraduate science students was selected through stratified random sampling from three strata: BS Physics, Mathematics and Biosciences programs. The sample consisted of 158 male and 320 female undergraduate science students. The hypotheses were tested using chi-square , t-test and coefficient of correlation at 95% significance level. The data was collected through standardized test named as “SHAPES” to identify the cognitive learning style of students. The attitude towards science was measured through self-developed tool. The findings revealed that female undergraduate science students were significantly Field Independent and possess greater attitude towards science than Field Dependent undergraduate male science students. Significant relationship was found between attitude towards science and Field Dependent-Field Independent cognitive learning style. It is recommended that educators and curriculum developers focus on student’s individual difference so they can learn according to their respective learning styles. In this way, Field Dependent undergraduate science students may also possess better science related attitude in support of improved academic achievement.
References
Abyaa, A., Khalidi, I. M., & Bennani, S. (2019). Learner modelling: systematic review of the literature from the last 5 years. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1105-1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09644-1
Alamolhodaei, H. (2001). Convergent/Divergent cognitive styles and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 24(2), 102-117.
Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students' academic achievement, field dependent/independent cognitive styles, and attitude towards computers. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 289.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, N.Y.
Ansburg, P. I. (2000). Individual differences in problem solving via insight. Current Psychology, 19(2), 143-146. doi:10.1007/s12144-000-1011-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1011-y
Bellová, R., Balážová, M., & Tom?ík, P. (2021). Are attitudes towards science and technology related to critical areas in science education?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1991298
Bellard, S. A. (2001). An examination of the relationship between field articulation, locus of control and aggression. http://digitalscholarship.tnstate.edu/dissertations/AAI3024613
Bieri, J. (1960). Parental identification, acceptance of authority and within-sex differences in cognitive behavior. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044591
Cellar, D. F., Durr, M. L., Halsell, S., & Doverspike, D. (1989). The effect of field independence, job analysis format, and sex of rater on the accuracy of job evaluation ratings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(5), 363-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00061.x
Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. F. (2007).The re-emergence of values in science education (D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, and R. F. Gunstone Eds.). Netherland: Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901677
DeYoung, C. G., Flanders, J. L., & Peterson, J. B. (2008). Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 278-290. Doi: 10.1080/10400410802278719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802278719
Fyle, C. O. (2009). The effects of field dependent/independent style awareness on learning strategies and outcomes in an instructional hypermedia module. (PhD Dissertation), Florada State University.(4369).
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 675-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.675
Hansson, S. B., Rydén, O. O., &Johnsson, P. (1986). Field-dependence/independence: ability in relation to mobility-fixity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(1), 279-293. Doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.63.1.279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.63.1.279
Healy, S. D., Harkins, D. A., & Ray, S. (2010). Battle Within: Role of Cognitive Style in Conflict Resolution Strategies, American Journal of Psychological Research, 6(1), 157-192.
Jones, M.G., & Leagon. M. (2014). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs: Reforming Practice In Norman G. Lederman, Sandra K. Abell (Eds), Handbook of research in science education, Volume 2, Taylor and Francis.
Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 383-405.
Kaya, H. (2012). An Investigation into Upper Elementary Students’ Attitude towards Science, European Journal of Physics Education, 3(2), 22-33. http://ejpe.erciyes.edu.tr/index.php/EJPE/article/view/58
Khine, M., &Saleh, I. (2011). Attitude research in science education: Looking back, looking forward. Attitude Research in Science Education: Classic and Contemporary Measurements, 291-296. Doi: 978-1-61735-326-0 (e-book)
Koballa, T. R. (1989). Changing and measuring attitude in the science classroom. Research matters—to the science teacher. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Lee, S. M., Kim, Y. R., & Lee, J. (1995). An empirical study of the relationship among end-user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (2), 189-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518086
Li, J. (2011). The Literature Review about the Research on Learning Style Both Abroad and at Home. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(12), 1780-1785. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.12.1780-1785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.12.1780-1785
Loader, E. C., Edwards, S. W., &Henschen, K. P. (1982).Field Dependent/Field Independent characteristics of male and female basketball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55(3), 883-890. Doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.3.883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1982.55.3.883
Mienaltowski, A. (2011). Everyday problem solving across the adult life span: solution diversity and efficacy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 75-85. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06207.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06207.x
Morrison, J. A.& Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers' diagnosis and understanding of students' preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849-867.ISSN: 1098-237X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10092
Mutlu, M., &Temiz, B. K. (2013).Science process skills of students having field-dependent and Field Independent cognitive styles. Educational Research Review, 8(11), 766-776. doi:10.5897/ERR2012.1104
Onyekuru, B. U. (2015). Field Dependence-Field Independence cognitive style, gender, career choice, and academic achievement of secondary school students in emohua local government area of rivers state. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(10), 76-85.
Organization for Economical Organization and Development (OECD) (2008). Annual Report, France.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitude towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education,25,1049-1079.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Prayekti (2018). The Influence of Cognitive Learning Style and Learning Independence on the Students’ Learning Outcomes. Higher Education Studies,8(2),37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v8n2p37
Sadler?Smith, E., & Smith, P. (2004). Strategies for accommodating individuals’ styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 395-412.doi: 10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00399.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00399.x
Saracho, O. N. (1998). Teachers’ perceptions of their matched students. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(3), 219-225.doi:10.1016/S0883-0355 (98)00026-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00026-3
Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Individual differences and learning strategies. In Learning and study strategies (pp. 171-191). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-742460-6.50016-5
Schuler, H., Farr, J. L., & Smith, M. (2013). Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives: Psychology Press.New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203772706
Shah, Z. A., &Mahmood, N. (2011). Developing a scale to measure attitude towards science learning among school students. Bulletin of Education and Research, 33(1), 71-81.
Shukla, R. (2005). India science report: science education, Human resources, and public attitude towards science and technology: East Asian Bureau of Economic Research. Cirrus Graphics Private Limited. New Delhi.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching.
Torres, R. M., & Cano, J. (1995). Critical thinking as influenced by learning style. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36, 55-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jaae.1995.04055
Waber, D. P. (1977). Biological substrates of field dependence: Implications of the sex difference. Psychological Bulletin, 84(6), 1076. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.6.1076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.6.1076
Wininger, S. R., Redifer, J. L., Norman, A. D., & Ryle, M. K. (2019). Prevalence of learning styles in educational psychology and introduction to education textbooks: a content analysis. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(3), 221-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719830301
Witkin, H. A. (1976). Cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher student relations. In S. Messick & Associates (Ed.), Individuality in Learning (pp. 38-72). San- Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
Witkin, H. A., &Goodenough, D. R. (1980). Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Psychological Issues, 51, 1-141.
Witkin, H., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A Manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t06471-000
Wyss, R. (2002). Field independent/dependent learning styles and L2 acquisition. The Weekly Column, Article 102. www.eltnewsletters.com/back/June2002/ art1022002.htm
Yim, S. (2009). The Challenges of Culture-based Learning: Indian Students' Experiences(Vol. 194): University Press of America.
Zaman, T.U. (2006). The Sciences, Subject-Choices, Performance and Extent of Divergence. Science, Technology and Development, 25 (3), 5-6.
Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. (2001). Thinking styles across cultures: Their relationships with student learning. In L.-f. Z. Robert J Sternberg (Ed.), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles (pp. 197-226). New York, NY: Routlege, Tylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605986-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr Farkhunda Rasheed Choudhry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction
and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the Journal website at (https://iprpk.com/ojs/index.php/jpap)
